Quintessence: Who Matters?
Quintessence: Who Matters?
A sample chapter excerpted from my new book “Quintessence“ – book available now on Leanpub (free sample also available).
Note: Each of the eighty-odd chapters in Part II of the book takes a specific meme, and describes the collective beliefs and assumptions that quintessential organisations hold in regard to the meme. By taking all the memes in toto, we can understand the way quintessential software development organisations see the world of work – and what makes them so effective. This particular sample meme is about who matters.
Chapter 15. Who Matters
Quintessential organisations regard the needs of their customers, staff, managers, investors, etc. as central to the way the work works. Collectively, these folks are sometimes called The Folks That Matter™️. These organisations invest much effort in:
- Identifying the various constituencies and the people who belongs to these constituencies.
- Tracking the set of constituencies, and the changing membership of these constituencies, over time.
“Understand stakeholder symmetry: Find the appropriate balance of competing claims by various groups of stakeholders.”
~ Warren G. Bennis
The quintessential organisation exhibits the following (collective) attitudes and feelings towards the Folks That Matter™️:
- A keen urge to understand and track the needs of all the Folks That Matter™️.
- Inviting folks to come up with explicit policies for defining and tracking membership of the set of all Folks That Matter™️.
- Practices to both discover and attend to these needs.
- Defining organisational success in terms of needs met.
Quintessential organisations recognise the major costs and other risks arising from missing out key members from the set of all Folks That Matter™️. These risks receive their continuous scrutiny – both in terms of accurately identifying members and in terms of ensuring these members’ needs are attended to, and ultimately, met. All work of the organisation is geared towards meeting the needs of the Folks That Matter™️. Maximising the amount of work NOT done is achieved by cautious (risk-aware) exclusion of insignificant groups and individuals from the set of the Folks that Matter™️, whilst striving to drive towards zero the instances of omission of significant groups and individuals from the set of the Folks that Matter™️.
Quintessential organisations recognise the distinction between stakeholders and The Folks That Matter™️. The needs of some stakeholders sometimes don’t much matter, and some of The Folks That Matter™️ aren’t actually seen as stakeholders (employees, for example). Given these distinctions, choosing different terms helps communication and, more significantly perhaps, improves Cost of Focus.
Kleiner, A. (2003). Who Really Matters. Currency.